Illustrative case study. Westmouth Harbour Authority, the vessels and every figure on this page are fictional, to show how a deployment would read.

Case study, illustrative

Westmouth, in one record.

How a small harbour authority went from disputed estimates to a sealed record of every pass, in one season.

The record: every capture, newest first, with its node, object, identity, speed and verdict
A review: a launch at 7.1 kn in a 6 kn zone, with radar, drive unit and AIS speeds side by side for a person to decide

The portal with its demo organisation, Westmouth Harbour Authority, which is fictional. Data illustrative.

Shore nodes2
Limit in the approach6 kn
SeasonApr to Sep
Passes recorded14,206

All figures illustrative.

The problem

Complaints about wash at the moorings had doubled in two seasons. The harbour had no record of who passed or how fast, and patrols covered a few hours a week.

The install

Two shore nodes on the approach, one on the harbour wall at HBR-02 and one on a post by the moorings. Fitted in a morning each, no mains.

The first season

Every pass recorded and sealed. Readings over the 6 knot limit went to a review queue; harbour officers decided each one, and wrote to skippers with the record attached.

One pass from the season.

Aurora, 14 August. Over the limit at the shore node, confirmed by her own drive unit and AIS. The harbour officer decided, and the skipper received the record.

A review: a launch at 7.1 kn in a 6 kn zone, with radar, drive unit and AIS speeds side by side for a person to decide
The Sensolytica portal. Demo organisation, data illustrative.

What changed, in the harbour's terms.

  • Every complaint answered with a record, or ruled out
  • Skippers shown their own readings, not an officer's estimate
  • Patrols planned around the hours with the most passes over the limit

Your harbour, next season.

Thirty minutes with an engineer: your units, your sites, and a sealed record from start to finish.